Hi! My name is Amanda. I'm an unschooler. I like food and ballroom dancing.
I'll be posting pretty much anything that catches my attention. Various geekery, cute fluffy animals, or just random cool stuff.
If you like the things I post you should talk to me about them!

 

givemeajobplease:

This was a man, dressed as a plant, making pigeon noises at people walking by. I said hello, asked if it was okay to take his picture, and then asked why he was dressed as a plant. He said, “I’m just working through some stuff. Thank you for asking. No ones asked yet.”

givemeajobplease:

This was a man, dressed as a plant, making pigeon noises at people walking by. I said hello, asked if it was okay to take his picture, and then asked why he was dressed as a plant. He said, “I’m just working through some stuff. Thank you for asking. No ones asked yet.”

kiayacranapple:

I named my laptop Schmendrick. My mother named her last one Petruchio. Mmm. That says something about us.

kiayacranapple:

I named my laptop Schmendrick. My mother named her last one Petruchio. Mmm. That says something about us.

(Source: roamingcatholics)

roarkshop:

aqueousserenade:

coledownlow:

I love this quote. I love this movie.

This scene impressed me so much when I first saw it. It still fills me with… idk something. I love it.

Still one of my favorite lines from a movie ever. 

(Source: moistowlettes)

addictedtopunsandpizza:

fuuuckinginsane:

foodtrucker:

i don’t want a boyfriend i just want multiple attractive boys to constantly give me attention

Finally

Break an expensive vase

hunters-of-gallifrey:

worcaholics:

judgementdays:

why is this whole website suddenly obsessed w/ cotton eyed joe

Yeah like where did it come from where did it go

did you just

imsirius:

“We were dancing everywhere. We’d be on breaks between filming, we were doing them. I remember there was a trip out to go see a band and we all went back to Emma’s house in London for a bit and we waltzed in her kitchen, just doing the dancing. Just practicing.” - Matt Lewis

i-like-blue-boxes:

faithandlovewillkeepmestrong:

I never saw her face the first time with the Daleks but her voice! It was the same voice! The same woman! Twice! And she died both times! The same woman!

#it is killing me how excited he is #because #like okay #clara died and came back to life/back into existence somehow and died again #and so he’s presuming there’s another clara out there (which clearly there is) #but like i can’t help but think he’s so excited because he thinks that just maybe #the universe has given a companion he can’t lose #i mean obviously she can die and the different claras all have different backgrounds and whatnot #and they don’t have their memories of their past/other lives clearly (except maybe when they die?) #but they’re all the same basic person right down to the fondness for souffles #and so maybe the universe has finally taken pity#except nothing’s ever that simple and it’s just going to end badly

#people who criticise Amy and Clara for not being ordinary girls and for having this timey wimey factor  #need to take a step back and remember that this is the kind of companion 11 needs  #9 and 10 needed someone simple and kind to mend him after the war  #they needed some ~stability because well everyone was pretty much dead  #but 11 needs something to get him going  #he needs a reason to keep travelling and to keep being himself  #11 is a child and he needs someone to play with  #someone to be a mystery  #this is the kind of companion he is drawn to and he can’t help it  #because he needs people like Clara and Amy  #he needs someone to bring him from here to there and to give him a reason to travel  #instead of staying stuck in victorian london being all grumpy #9 and 10 needed someone that would be amazed by them and that would be in awe of the things they see  #so they can be in awe as well with them  #they needed someone with a contagious innocence and willingness to embrace a new world  #so he could once again discover it trought them  #and not be all grumpy pants  #idk i think different doctors need different types of companions  #HE NEEDS a companion always #but the type changes

(Source: oswald-souffle)

sanityscraps:

latentpower:

awkwardsituationist:

cambridge university students were asked on campus why they needed feminism. here are 60 answers. click the link for over about 600 more.

This is amazing

I’m so happy that there’s that guy who admits that he knows he’s sexist. All men are to some degree. We’re all taught to be. Being an ally is an unlearning process.

grantaire-put-that-bottle-down:

ihititwithmyaxe:

mothernaturenetwork:

 Harry Potter wizarding genetics decoded



If the wizarding gene is dominant, as J.K. Rowling says in her famous series of Harry Potter books, then how can a wizard be born to muggle parents (non-magical people)? And how can there be squibs (non-magical people born into wizarding lines)?
It seems these baffling genetic questions have finally been answered, thanks to Andrea Klenotiz, a biology student at the University of Delaware.
In a six-page paper, which she sent to Rowling, Klenotiz outlines how the wizarding gene works and even explains why some witches and wizards are more powerful than others.
“Magical ability could be explained by a single autosomal dominant gene if it is caused by an expansion of trinucleotide repeats with non-Mendelian ratios of inheritance,” Klenotiz explains.
What does this mean?
In school we learn the fundamentals of genetics by studying Gregory Mendel’s pea plant experiments and completing basic Punnett squares. Basically, we’re taught that whenever one copy of a gene linked to a dominant trait is present, then the offspring will exhibit that dominant trait, regardless of the other gene.
However, Non-Mendelian genes don’t follow this rule, which is the basis of Klenotiz’s argument. She says that the wizarding gene could be explained if it’s caused by a trinucleotide repeat, which is the repetition of three nucleotides — the building blocks of DNA — multiple times.
These repeats can be found in normal genes, but sometimes many more copies of this repeated code can appear in genes than is standard, causing a mutation. This kind of mutation is responsible for genetic diseases like Huntington’s Disease. Depending upon how many of these repeats occur in the genes, a person could exhibit no symptoms, could have a mild form of the disease or could have a severe form of it.
In her paper, Klenotiz argues that eggs with high levels of these repeats are more likely to be fertilized, a phenomenon known as transmission ratio distortion. She also suggests that the egg or sperm with high levels of repeats is less likely to be created or to survive in the wizarding womb.
This argument answers several questions about wizarding genetics:
How can a wizard be born to muggle parents?
Genetic mutations can randomly appear, meaning anyone could be born with the wizarding gene. However, there’s a better chance of magical offspring occurring if the parents are on the high side of the normal range for mutations.
How can a squib be born to wizard parents?
Although parents with these mutated magical genes would be likely to pass the gene on to their children, there’s still a possibility that any given offspring might not inherit the trinucleotide repeat.
How can varying degrees of magical ability be explained?
The more repeats a wizard inherits, the stronger the magical power he or she will have. If both wizarding parents are powerful wizards, it’s likely their offspring will also be powerful.
You can read Klenotiz’s full paper on wizarding genetics here.




Far and away one of the nerdiest things I’ve ever read. Love it.

grantaire-put-that-bottle-down:

ihititwithmyaxe:

mothernaturenetwork:

Harry Potter wizarding genetics decoded

If the wizarding gene is dominant, as J.K. Rowling says in her famous series of Harry Potter books, then how can a wizard be born to muggle parents (non-magical people)? And how can there be squibs (non-magical people born into wizarding lines)?

It seems these baffling genetic questions have finally been answered, thanks to Andrea Klenotiz, a biology student at the University of Delaware.

In a six-page paper, which she sent to Rowling, Klenotiz outlines how the wizarding gene works and even explains why some witches and wizards are more powerful than others.

“Magical ability could be explained by a single autosomal dominant gene if it is caused by an expansion of trinucleotide repeats with non-Mendelian ratios of inheritance,” Klenotiz explains.

What does this mean?

In school we learn the fundamentals of genetics by studying Gregory Mendel’s pea plant experiments and completing basic Punnett squares. Basically, we’re taught that whenever one copy of a gene linked to a dominant trait is present, then the offspring will exhibit that dominant trait, regardless of the other gene.

However, Non-Mendelian genes don’t follow this rule, which is the basis of Klenotiz’s argument. She says that the wizarding gene could be explained if it’s caused by a trinucleotide repeat, which is the repetition of three nucleotides — the building blocks of DNA — multiple times.

These repeats can be found in normal genes, but sometimes many more copies of this repeated code can appear in genes than is standard, causing a mutation. This kind of mutation is responsible for genetic diseases like Huntington’s Disease. Depending upon how many of these repeats occur in the genes, a person could exhibit no symptoms, could have a mild form of the disease or could have a severe form of it.

In her paper, Klenotiz argues that eggs with high levels of these repeats are more likely to be fertilized, a phenomenon known as transmission ratio distortion. She also suggests that the egg or sperm with high levels of repeats is less likely to be created or to survive in the wizarding womb.

This argument answers several questions about wizarding genetics:

How can a wizard be born to muggle parents?

Genetic mutations can randomly appear, meaning anyone could be born with the wizarding gene. However, there’s a better chance of magical offspring occurring if the parents are on the high side of the normal range for mutations.

How can a squib be born to wizard parents?

Although parents with these mutated magical genes would be likely to pass the gene on to their children, there’s still a possibility that any given offspring might not inherit the trinucleotide repeat.

How can varying degrees of magical ability be explained?

The more repeats a wizard inherits, the stronger the magical power he or she will have. If both wizarding parents are powerful wizards, it’s likely their offspring will also be powerful.

You can read Klenotiz’s full paper on wizarding genetics here.

Far and away one of the nerdiest things I’ve ever read. Love it.

image